“History is the third parent.” This bold declaration is the
opening statement of Nadeem Aslam’s novel, The Blind Man’s Garden and
serves the purpose of reminding readers that no matter how seemingly righteous
the fight, history declares no ultimate winners.
Among the first signs of human evolution was when one autonomous
group of pre-literate beings organized enough to wreak ferocious havoc upon
another group of beings. In other words, the declaration and act of war. Whether
war is waged in defense of livelihood, perpetuation of religion, or revenge for
a wrong, history teaches us that the costs of war are high. Aslam’s novel, The Blind Man's Garden, places
human faces upon the American enemy during the War Against Terrorism, an
uncomfortable but necessary feeling for many American readers.
The plot of this book is one completely relatable to any culture: two men,
raised as brothers, fall in love with the same girl. They run off during the
war with a hero complex and dreams of saving the lives of their fellow man.
Meanwhile, the girl of their dreams is left behind, along with a father, to
deal with increasingly intolerant fundamentalist organization that has growing
military and political power. One of the protagonists dies and the other is
left to suffer through terrible trials while attempting to get back to the
woman he loves. The very humanness of the storyline creates connections between
reader and those living in Afghanistan in the early days of the American
invasion. It makes the Afghan “enemy” visibly human and not just a faceless mass
that inhabits a country that just delivered a devastating blow to American
citizens on American soil. This is the first step of creating compassion for
those labeled enemy.
Jeo and Mikal, the foster brother protagonists of the novel,
are the embodiment of every young adult seeking to make a mark upon the world
by doing something good. History teaches us that these types of young men are
the finders of continents and the discoverers of world wonders. These two are
no different. Supposedly leaving their native Afghanistan for Pakistan, the men
are heading to treat casualties of a war about which they know very little.
They only know there are not enough people to provide aid to the wounded. However, they decide to go to the front lines
of the war instead, hoping to be more help in a more desperate situation. You
can feel the desire of these young men to do good for others in need as well as
the typical male attraction for grand adventure supposedly found at ground zero
of every romanticized war. Soon, Jeo is dead, leaving behind his wife, Naheed,
and Mikal is sold as a fake “terrorist” to the American soldiers by an Afghani
woman seeking revenge against Jeo’s and Mikal’s father. With an underlying
message of blind hate and blundering military occupation, Mikal suffers
mightily at the hands of American military members who assume every young male
in Afghanistan is guilty of terroristic activity. Most of us know many American
men of the same age as Mikal and Jeo, with the same desires, and suddenly the
atrocities inflicted upon Mikal and Jeo are less anonymous and more someone’s brother,
uncle, son. This is step two of Aslam’s ability to generate kindness from readers
whose families might be on the opposite side as his characters.
Another character, Naheed, sheds light on the
marginalization of women within Afghanistan and surrounding countries during
this time period. Historically, women of all cultures have been members of a
lesser class at some point or another, particularly in Islamic cultures. Aslam
presents his characters as enlightened practioners of Islam (mostly) and this
is seen clearly as Naheed transforms herself from a woman who married a man (Jeo),
not for love but because of societal expectations to a woman who seeks out the
man she desires (Mikal) despite intense disapproval. Additionally, she denounces
cultural superstitions and discriminations against women, and goes on to have both
a relationship and a child with Mikal. In fact, we see Naheed, and Jeo’s sister
Basie (interestingly named after the famous American musician, Count Basie) bond
together in determination to become more than what they are told they should be.
This fierceness to prevail over decades of persecution and suppression is part
of the history and foundation of America. By creating a character so easily relatable
to western ideologies, Aslam opens the minds of readers who might not otherwise
be so willing to see Afghani women as more than shunned and beaten wives of
barbaric fundamentalists. To be clear, Aslam is not trying to Westernize Afghanistan
but only wants to showcase the commonalities between the peoples of different
countries. Here is step three of Aslam’s model of compassion for the enemy.
Even the descriptions of Afghanistan are written in such a
way that literary analysts find themselves comparing the rugged, mountainous
terrain of Mikal’s and Jeo’s homeland to that of the American West. Without eliminating
what makes the Afghan mountains and villages unique and using rich, descriptive
language, Aslam draws connections from this country to the lands of North
America. For readers, this is yet another subtle hint that citizens of American
and citizens of Afghanistan have more in common that initially believed. While
there is no denying that a terrorist group from Afghanistan delivered the first
blow of the war, both sides of the war experienced atrocities for which they
did nothing to deserve.
A final thought about Aslam’s novel. Aslam’s family moved
from Pakistan to Britain when he was 14. His father was a communist and the
governing body of Pakistan at the time was pro-American and anti-communist. He
became an immigrant due to forced migration, and as such, Aslam was exposed to
many of the difficulties that migrants face: displacement, discrimination, lack
of inclusion, no sense of true identity, and marginalization. These experiences
no doubt contributed to Aslam’s ability to describe similar scenarios genuinely
and intuitively within his novel. His status as an immigrant created both advantages
and disadvantages that are reflected in his characters and in his desire to expose
his readers to this reality.
History has exposed the detriment of miscommunications and
misunderstandings. These human fallacies have caused wars for centuries. History
has equally shown that understanding breeds compassion and compassion for
others can prevent atrocities. And there is little doubt that America could use a bit more
understanding and compassion for those on the other side of any war.
No comments:
Post a Comment